Sunday, May 17, 2009

LTTE leader Prabhakaran rumored dead.

A preliminary report is here.

And I say, good riddance to bad rubbish. This inhuman s.o.b assassinated an Indian Prime Minister, (Sinhalese) politicians, rival Sri Lankan Tamil politicians, recruited children to be cannon fodder and led thousands of his followers into death and desolation. On principle, I oppose anyone who kills innocents in the name of some holy cause of religion or ethnicity or political belief.


Parallelly in India, the voters of Tamil Nadu have voted against the pro LTTE parties and handed them a convincing defeat. It is insane for a vocal minority in Tamil Nadu or the West to ask India to interfere in the another nation's internal affairs just because some people there speak the same language as some Indian Citizens. If this kind of reasoning is valid, Pakistan's meddling in Kashmir is valid too. At best, it is a superficial activity like our own NRIs (Non resident Indians) pontificating about what policies India should adopt while working towards American citizenships. Hypocrites all!


No matter what happens in SriLanka, it is matter for *Sri Lankans* to resolve. India can use peaceful means to try influencing Sri Lanka for sure but sending the Indian Army to fight in Sri Lanka and arming/ tolerating the LTTE before that was stupidity of the first order. Sri Lanka will work out its solutions as per the wishes of the Sri Lankans.

To conclude, congratulations to the Sri Lankan Army. Now, if the Sinhalese leadership can follow military victory with a halfway decent political reform/reconciliation effort, that will be the end of this insurgency and this part of the world will have peace.

Here is to hoping the Islamic terrorists get wiped off the pages of history as well. Hopefully Osama Bin Laden and his gang of fanatics will soon hang from the lamp posts too. Then the rest of us can get on with our lives in peace.

5 comments:

Jeyaraj said...

The last paragraph of your post is very impressive. Cheers.

Anonymous said...

"On principle, I oppose anyone who kills innocents in the name of some holy cause of religion or ethnicity or political belief."

Would you say the same to a young muslim man who lost his entire family to rampaging hindu mobs in Gujarat ? Is it not natural for him to seek revenge ?

Ravi said...

replace muslim and hindu with anything you want and my position holds. an gujarat with say, Kashmir ;-).

So, in yur scenario I oppose the "Hindu mob in Gujarat", and if the muslim man starts killing innocents in "revenge" I oppose him too.



Srange how all these philosophers remain "anonymous" ;-)

Anonymous said...

The next s.o.b to go should be http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dC2aDHtEqk

Ravi said...

"India should have involved diplomatically and should have brought this issue to a conclusion long ago. "

diplomacy doesn't work when one of the principals is a psychopath who wants tasome kind of Stalinistic dictatorship(ref mahathaya). If India had supported Prabhakaran we'd be caught in an eternal quagmire. Now i is finished.

As to "being sorrounded" that is a completely different ballgame and unless you plan to go to war with the Chinese (bad idea)is not of *immediate* concern.